Senate
House
Joint
Bill Status
WV Code
Audits/ Reports
Educational
Contact
home
home

Introduced Version Senate Bill 99 History

DOWNLOAD  wpd  |  Email


sb99 intr
Senate Bill No. 99

(By Senator White)

____________

[Introduced February 11, 2009; referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.]

____________




A BILL to amend and reenact §25-4-6 of the Code of West Virginia, 1931, as amended, relating to assignment of youthful offenders to the custody of the Division of Corrections; and providing that where an offender has completed the treatment program and is returned to court for sentencing but commits a crime between the time of release from the youthful offender center and the sentencing hearing, the judge has the discretion to impose the original sentence instead of releasing the offender on probation.

Be it enacted by the Legislature of West Virginia:
That §25-4-6 of the Code of West Virginia, 1931, as amended, be amended and reenacted to read as follows:
ARTICLE 4. CENTERS FOR HOUSING YOUNG ADULT OFFENDERS.
§25-4-6. Assignment of offenders to center; period of center confinement; return to court; sentence or probation; revocation of probation.

The judge of any court with original criminal jurisdiction may suspend the imposition of sentence of any young adult, as defined in this section, convicted of or pleading guilty to a felony offense, other than an offense punishable by life imprisonment, including, but not limited to, felony violations of the provisions of chapter seventeen-c of this code, who has attained his or her eighteenth birthday but has not reached his or her twenty-third birthday at the time of the sentencing by the court and commit the young adult to the custody of the West Virginia commissioner of corrections to be assigned to a center. Young adult offenders who have previously been committed to a young adult offender center are not eligible for commitment to this program. The period of confinement in the center shall be for a period of not less than six months or longer but not more than two years to successfully complete the program requirements set by the warden. but in any event the period of confinement may not exceed two years The court shall order a presentence investigation to be conducted and provide the warden with a copy of the presentence investigation report, along with the commitment order.
If, in the opinion of the warden, the young adult offender proves to be is an unfit person to remain in the center, the offender shall be returned to the committing court to be dealt with further according to law. The offender is entitled to a hearing before the committing court to review the warden?s determination. The standard for review is whether the warden, considering the offender?s overall record at the center and the offender?s compliance with the center?s rules, regulations, programs and services, abused his or her discretion in determining that the offender is an unfit person to remain in the center. At the hearing before the committing court, the state need not offer independent proof of the offender?s disciplinary infractions contained in the record of the center when opportunity for an administrative hearing on those infractions was previously made available at the institution. In the event that If the court upholds the warden?s determination, the court may sentence the offender for the crime for which the offender was convicted of. In his or her discretion, the judge may allow the defendant credit on the sentence for time the offender spent in the center.
A young adult offender shall be returned to the jurisdiction of the court which originally committed the offender when, in the opinion of the warden, the young adult offender has satisfactorily completed the center training program. The offender is then eligible for probation for the offense with which the offender is charged was convicted of or plead guilty to and the judge of the court shall immediately place the offender on probation. However, if the offender engages in new criminal conduct between his or her release from the center and the sentencing hearing, the judge may, in his or her discretion, sentence the offender for the crime for which the offender was convicted, giving the offender credit for the time he or she spent at the center. In the event the offender's probation is subsequently revoked, the judge shall impose the sentence the young adult offender would have originally received had the offender not been committed to the center and subsequently placed on probation. The court shall, however, give the offender credit on his or her sentence for the time spent in the center.


NOTE: The purpose of this bill is to give a circuit judge discretion to impose the original sentence on a youthful offender who has successfully completed a youthful offender training program but who has been charged with committing another crime between his or her release from the youthful offender center and the sentencing hearing.

Strike-throughs indicate language that would be stricken from the present law, and underscoring indicates new language that would be added.
This Web site is maintained by the West Virginia Legislature's Office of Reference & Information.  |  Terms of Use  |   Web Administrator   |   © 2014 West Virginia Legislature ***