| Date Requested:March 08, 2011 Time Requested:01:04 PM |
| |||||||||||||||
| FUND(S) | |||
|---|---|---|---|
Sources of Revenue | |||
| General Fund | |||
Legislation creates:
A New Program | |||
Effect this measure will have on costs and revenues of state government.
| This bill clarifies that the probation officers are authorized to supervise sex offenders until such time that a multi-judicial officer is available to do so. It has no fiscal impact on the Judiciary. |
| Over-all effect |
| Effect of Proposal | Fiscal Year | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 2011 Increase/Decrease (use"-") |
2012 Increase/Decrease (use"-") |
Fiscal Year (Upon Full Implementation) | |
| 1. Estmated Total Cost | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Personal Services | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Current Expenses | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Repairs and Alterations | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Assets | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Other | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 2. Estimated Total Revenues | 0 | 0 | 0 |
|
3. Explanation of above estimates (including long-range effect):
|
| This bill just clarifies the duties of the court's probation officer. Since these officers are already employed by the Judiciary, then there is no fiscal impact on the State. |