| Date Requested:March 07, 2005 Time Requested:01:18 PM |
| |||||||||||||||
| FUND(S) General Revenue Fund | |||
|---|---|---|---|
Sources of Revenue | |||
| General Fund | |||
Legislation creates:
Neither Program nor Fund | |||
Effect this measure will have on costs and revenues of state government.
| The stated purpose of this bill is to phase out and abolish the business franchise tax on and after July 1, 2007.
According to our interpretation, passage of this bill would result in a decline in the General Revenue Fund as shown in the table below. Although the tax is abolished for tax years beginning on or after July 1, 2007, current collection patterns indicate some residual collections would occur up to three years later. FY2007 ($18.0 million) FY2008 ($68.0 million) FY2009 ($112.0 million) FY2010 ($125.0 million) FY2011+ ($130.0+ million) Additional administrative costs to the Tax Department associated with this bill would be roughly $34,000 in fiscal year 2006 and about $24,000 in the following fiscal year. |
| Over-all effect |
| Effect of Proposal | Fiscal Year | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 2005 Increase/Decrease (use"-") |
2006 Increase/Decrease (use"-") |
Fiscal Year (Upon Full Implementation) | |
| 1. Estmated Total Cost | 0 | 34,000 | 24,000 |
| Personal Services | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Current Expenses | 0 | 23,000 | 23,000 |
| Repairs and Alterations | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Assets | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Other | 0 | 11,000 | 1,000 |
| 2. Estimated Total Revenues | 0 | 0 | -130,000,000 |
|
3. Explanation of above estimates (including long-range effect):
According to our interpretation, passage of this bill would result in a decline in the General Revenue Fund as shown in the table below. Although the tax is abolished for tax years beginning on or after July 1, 2007, current collection patterns indicate some residual collections would occur up to three years later.
FY2007 ($18.0 million) FY2008 ($68.0 million) FY2009 ($112.0 million) FY2010 ($125.0 million) FY2011+ ($130.0+ million) Additional administrative costs to the Tax Department associated with this bill would be roughly $34,000 in fiscal year 2006 and about $24,000 in the following fiscal year. |