Eighty-second Legislature

First Regular Session

Held at Charleston

Published by the Clerk of the House

 

West Virginia Legislature

JOURNAL

of the

House of Delegates

colorseal.jpg



__________*__________



 

Monday, February 23, 2015

FORTY-FIRST DAY

[Mr. Speaker, Mr. Armstead, in the Chair]

 

 

            The House of Delegates met at 11:00 a.m., and was called to order by the Honorable Tim Armstead, Speaker.

            Prayer was offered and the House was led in recitation of the Pledge of Allegiance.

            The Clerk proceeded to read the Journal of Friday, February 20, 2015, being the first order of business, when the further reading thereof was dispensed with and the same approved.

Committee Reports

            Delegate Hamilton, Chair of the Committee on Agriculture and Natural Resources, submitted the following report, which was received:

            Your Committee on Agriculture and Natural Resources has had under consideration:

            H. B. 2730, Updating unlawful methods of bear hunting and clarifying the process for bear damage claims,

            And reports the same back with the recommendation that it do pass, but that it first be referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.

            In accordance with the former direction of the Speaker, the bill (H. B. 2730) was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.

            On motion for leave, a bill was introduced (Originating in the Committee on Agriculture and Natural Resources and reported with the recommendation that it do pass), which was read by its title, as follows:

By Delegates A. Evans, Hamilton, Folk, Lynch, Williams, R. Smith, Canterbury, Lynch, Romine and Ambler:

            H. B. 2888 - “A Bill to amend and reenact §19-9-34 of the Code of West Virginia, 1931, as amended, relating to allowing the use of rotary drum composters to destroy or dispose of the carcass of any animal to prevent the spread of disease.”

Messages from the Senate

            A message from the Senate, by

            The Clerk of the Senate, announced that the Senate had passed, with a title amendment, a bill of the House of Delegates, as follows:

            Com. Sub. for H. B. 2010, Requiring the elections of justices of the West Virginia Supreme Court of Appeals, circuit court judges, family court judges and magistrates be nonpartisan and by division.

            On motion of Delegate Cowles, the bill was taken up for immediate consideration.

            The following Senate title amendment was reported by the Clerk:

            Com. Sub. for H. B. 2010 - “A Bill to amend and reenact §3-1-16 and §3-1-17 of the Code of West Virginia, 1931, as amended; to amend and reenact §3-4A-11a of said code; to amend and reenact §3-5-4 of said code; to amend said code by adding thereto four new sections, designated §3-5-6a, §3-5-6b, §3-5-6c and §3-5-6d; to amend and reenact §3-5-7, §3-5-13 and §3-5-13a of said code; to amend and reenact §3-10-3 of said code; to amend and reenact §3-12-3, §3-12-6, §3-12-10, §3-12-11, §3-12-12 and §3-12-14 of said code; to amend and reenact §6-5-1 of said code; to amend and reenact §50-1-1 and §50-1-6 of said code; to amend and reenact §51-1-1 of said code; and to amend and reenact §51-2A-5 of said code, all relating to electoral reforms of the West Virginia judiciary generally; requiring the election of justices of the Supreme Court of Appeals, circuit court judges, family court judges and magistrates be on a nonpartisan basis; requiring that elections to certain offices be on a division basis when more than one justice of the Supreme Court of Appeals, circuit judge, family court judge or magistrate is to be elected; providing for the timing and frequency of election; providing for the commencement of terms of office; establishing ballot design and printing; providing that elections for justice of the Supreme Court of Appeals, circuit judge, family court judge or magistrate are to be held on the same date as the primary election; requiring nonpartisan ballots be used; establishing filing announcement of candidacies, including the timing, location and information necessary thereto; providing for the order of appearance of offices on the ballot; establishing ballot content; providing the procedures for the filling of vacancies in the offices of justices of the Supreme Court of Appeals, circuit judge, family court judge or magistrate; providing occasions for special elections to be held to fill vacancies; providing that unsuccessful nonpartisan candidates can be selected to fill ballot vacancies in a general election; providing the timing of commencement of the terms of offices of justices of the Supreme Court of Appeals, circuit judge, family court judge or magistrate; and providing for the continuing applicability of the West Virginia Supreme Court of Appeals Public Campaign Financing Program.

            On motion of Delegate Cowles, the House of Delegates concurred in the Senate amendment.

            The bill, as amended by the Senate, was then put upon its passage.

            On the passage of the bill, the yeas and nays were taken (Roll No. 164), and there were--yeas 89, nays 7, absent and not voting 4, with the nays and absent and not voting being as follows:

            Nays: Caputo, Fleischauer, Longstreth, Lynch, Manchin, Perry and Pushkin.

            Absent and Not Voting: Boggs, Byrd, Hartman and Moore.

             So, a majority of the members elected to the House of Delegates having voted in the affirmative, the Speaker declared the bill (Com. Sub. for H. B. 2010) passed.

            Ordered, That the Clerk of the House communicate to the Senate the action of the House of Delegates.

Resolutions Introduced

            Delegates Walters, Cowles and Hanshaw offered the following resolution, which was read by its title and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary then Rules:

            H. C. R. 84 - “Requesting the Joint Committee on Government and Finance study the magistrate court cost collection process and make recommendations to improve the same.”

            Whereas, Various state agencies and counties rely on the receipt of funds generated by magistrate court costs; and

            Whereas, The failure to collect magistrate court costs and fees have a negative effect, particularly on the bond repayment for the Regional Jail and Correctional Facility Authority; and

            Whereas, Methods of enforcing collection of delinquent costs owed to the magistrate court funds have improved; and

            Whereas, It would be beneficial to West Virginia, the Regional Jail and Correctional Facility Authority and the various county governments if the collection of delinquent magistrate court costs were improved; therefore, be it

            Resolved by the Legislature of West Virginia:

            That the Joint Committee on Government and Finance is hereby requested to study the magistrate court cost collection process and make recommendations to improve the same; and, be it

            Further Resolved, That the Joint Committee on Government and Finance report to the regular session of the Legislature, 2016, on its findings, conclusions and recommendations, together with drafts of any rules or legislation necessary to effectuate its recommendations, including drafts of naming criteria; and, be it

            Further Resolved, That the expenses necessary to conduct this study, to prepare a report and to draft necessary legislation be paid from legislative appropriations to the Joint Committee on Government and Finance.

            Delegates J. Nelson, Ambler, Blair, Butler, Cooper, Espinosa, Ferro, Fluharty, Folk, Hill, Ireland, Kessinger, Kurcaba, Manchin, Marcum, McGeehan, Miley, Moore, Moye, O’Neal, Perdue, Perry, Pethtel, R. Phillips, Rohrbach, Rowan, R. Smith, Sobonya, Sponaugle, Statler, Upson, Wagner, Walters, Westfall, H. White, Williams and Zatezalo offered the following resolution, which was read by its title and referred to the Committee on Roads and Transportation then Rules:

            H. C. R. 85 - “Requesting the Division of Highways to name a future bridge, 03-3/14-0.10 (design # 11082) (38.09778, -81.61498), carrying county route 3/14 over Big Coal River in Boone County, the ‘U.S. Navy MM2 Carl E. Keeney and U.S. Army PFC Carl M. Nicholas Memorial Bridge’.”

            Whereas, Carl Eugene Keeney was born to Dewey and Ruth Skeens Keeney on March 27, 1925, in Seth, West Virginia. He learned to repair engines and vehicles at an early age and became skilled as a machinist. When this country sought skilled tradesmen in its Armed Forces, he enlisted in the United States Navy in 1942, eventually attaining the rating of Machinist's Mate - Second Class. Machinist's Mate Keeney served over three years in the Pacific Theater and saw combat in the Solomon Islands and at Okinawa. He was awarded three battle stars before he was honorably discharged in 1946. Thereafter, Carl E. Keeney applied his machinist's skills in the coal industry, working as a driver, mechanic and machinist in Boone County until his retirement; and

            Whereas, Carl M. Nicholas was born to Dan and Frona Cottrell Nicholas on September 27, 1922, in Bickmore, West Virginia. Though he left school after eight years to help support his family, he became quite accomplished in a mining career that spanned five decades in the coalfields of southern West Virginia. He answered his nation’s call to service, joining the United States Army in World War II in the European Theater of Operations. He participated in the Invasion of Normandy on D-Day and in the Battle of the Bulge. He also received and survived bullet wounds from a German sniper, for which he was awarded the Purple Heart. Upon his return to civilian life, he continued his mining career with some of the most prominent companies in the industry and he became a successful businessman as proprietor of his own trucking company. He continued to support military veterans and was a leader of the effort to secure dedicated parking for veterans at our State Capitol. After a life well lived in service to his community and his country, Carl M. Nicholas passed away on September 3, 2014; and

            Whereas, It is an appropriate recognition of their contributions to their country, state, community and Boone County to name a bridge over the Big Coal River in their honor; therefore, be it

            Resolved by the Legislature of West Virginia:

            That the Division of Highways is hereby requested to name the future bridge, 03-3/14-0.10 (design # 11082) (38.09778, -81.61498), carrying county route 3/14 over Big Coal River in Boone County, the “U.S. Navy MM2 Carl E. Keeney and U.S. Army PFC Carl M. Nicholas Memorial Bridge”; and, be it

            Further Resolved, That the Division of Highways is requested to have made and be placed signs identifying the bridge as the “U.S. Navy MM2 Carl E. Keeney and U.S. Army PFC Carl M. Nicholas Memorial Bridge”; and, be it

            Further Resolved, That the Clerk of the House of Delegates forward a certified copy of this resolution to the Secretary of the Department of Transportation and to the families of each of these honored veterans.

Bills Introduced

            On motions for leave, bills were introduced, read by their titles, and severally referred as follows:

By Delegates Arvon, Fast, Kessinger, Azinger, Butler, Moye, R. Phillips, Hamrick, Border, Canterbury and Perry:

            H. B. 2881 - “A Bill to amend the Code of West Virginia, 1931, as amended, be amended by adding thereto a new article, designated §5B-4-1, §5B-4-2, §5B-4-3, §5B-4-4 and §5B-4-5, all relating to creating the West Virginia Intrastate Commerce Improvement Act; and ensuring that businesses, organizations and employers doing business in West Virginia are subject to uniform nondiscrimination laws and obligations”; to the Committee on Government Organization.

By Delegates Frich, Statler, Pasdon, Kurcaba, Fleischauer and Manchin:

            H. B. 2882 - “A Bill to amend and reenact §50-1-2 of the Code of West Virginia, 1931, as amended, relating to increasing the number of magistrates in Monongalia County by one”; to the Committee on Political Subdivisions then the Judiciary.

By Delegates Boggs, Manchin, Longstreth, Folk, Canterbury, Rowan, Perry, Pethtel, Ferro, Lane and A. Evans:

            H. B. 2883 - “A Bill to amend and reenact §24-3-1b of the Code of West Virginia, 1931, as amended, relating to requiring, for safety reasons, minimum personnel of two on certain trains”; to the Committee on Industry and Labor then the Judiciary.

By Delegates Pasdon and Perry:

            H. B. 2884 - “A Bill to amend and reenact §18B-1D-9 of the Code of West Virginia, 1931, as amended, relating to modifying training and development requirement for certain members of Higher Education Policy Commission, council for community and technical college education and institutional governing boards”; to the Committee on Education.

By Delegates Skinner, Fleischauer, Pushkin, Storch and Hamrick:

            H. B. 2885 - “A Bill to amend the Code of West Virginia, 1931, as amended, by adding thereto a new article, designated §47-12-1, §47-12-2, §47-12-3, §47-12-4, §47-12-5, §47-12-6 and§47-12-7, all relating to the Youth Mental Health Protection Act; legislative findings; purpose; definitions; prohibition on conversion therapy; referral services; and discipline”; to the Committee on Health and Human Resources then the Judiciary.

By Delegates Howell, Folk, Foster, Ihle, Hill, Hamrick, Storch and Azinger:

            H. B. 2886 - “A Bill to amend and reenact §46A-6-107 of the Code of West Virginia, 1931, as amended, relating to conditions under which used manufactured homes may be sold with warranty exclusions, limitations or modifications; allowing used manufactured homes to be sold with warranty limitations; allowing a waiver of warranties of particular defects disclosed in writing; establishing conditions permitting ‘as is’ sales of used manufactured homes; and requiring conspicuous disclosure of ‘as is’ sale conditions”; to the Committee on the Judiciary.

By Delegates Ellington, Gearheart, Border, Ambler, Cooper, Shott, Overington, Householder, Butler, R. Phillips and E. Nelson:

            H. B. 2887 - “A Bill to amend and reenact §17B-2-3a of the Code of West Virginia, 1931, as amended; and to amend said code by adding thereto a new section, designated §33-6-38, all relating to Division of Motor Vehicles instructional permits requirements; drug testing for a level two intermediate driver’s license; possible insurance premium reduction”; to the Committee on Health and Human Resources then the Judiciary.

Special Calendar

Unfinished Business

            H. C. R. 83, Requesting the Joint Committee on Government and Finance to study the needs, challenges, and issues facing municipalities in this state as to the funding of their police and firefighter pension plans; coming up in regular order, as unfinished business, was reported by the Clerk and adopted.

            Ordered, That the Clerk of the House communicate to the Senate the action of the House of Delegates and request concurrence therein.

Third ReadingCom. Sub. for H. B. 2562, Relating to sales tax increment financing; on third reading, coming up in regular order, with an amendment pending, was reported by the Clerk.

            Delegate Sponaugle moved to amend the bill on page six, section seven-a, lines sixty-five through seventy, by striking out “On the first day of each fiscal year, any monthly deficiencies for an economic opportunity development district remaining from the prior fiscal year shall be discharged and shall not be taken into consideration by the State Treasurer when the monthly deposits are made to the General Revenue Fund pursuant to this section.”

            During the debate on the amendment, Members were discussing the merits of the bill. The Speaker reminded the Members to confine their remarks to the amendment.

            On the adoption of the amendment, Delegate Sponaugle demanded the yeas and nays, which demand was sustained.

            The yeas and nays having been ordered, they were taken (Roll No. 165), and there were--yeas 31, nays 63, absent and not voting 6, with the yeas and absent and not voting being as follows:

            Yeas: Anderson, Bates, Byrd, Campbell, Caputo, Eldridge, Ferro, Fluharty, Folk, Guthrie, Hicks, Hornbuckle, Longstreth, Lynch, Manchin, Marcum, Morgan, Moye, Perdue, Perry, L. Phillips, Pushkin, Reynolds, Rodighiero, Rohrbach, Skinner, P. Smith, Sponaugle, Trecost, H. White and Williams.

            Absent and Not Voting: Boggs, Hartman, Lane, Moore, Rowe and Zatezalo.

             So, a majority of the members present and voting not having voted in the affirmative, the amendment was not adopted.

            Having been engrossed, the bill was then read a third time and put upon its passage.

            The question being on the passage of the bill, the yeas and nays were taken (Roll No. 166), and there were--yeas 75, nays 20, absent and not voting 5, with the nays and absent and not voting being as follows:

            Nays: Bates, Byrd, Eldridge, Faircloth, Folk, Guthrie, Ihle, Lynch, Marcum, McGeehan, Moffatt, J. Nelson, Perdue, Perry, Pushkin, Reynolds, Rodighiero, P. Smith, Sponaugle and H. White.

            Absent and Not Voting: Boggs, Hartman, Lane, Moore and Rowe.

            So, a majority of the members present and voting having voted in the affirmative, the Speaker declared the bill (Com. Sub. for H. B. 2562) passed.

            H. B. 2770, Making a supplementary appropriation from the State Fund, State Excess Lottery Revenue Fund, to the Division of Human Services; on third reading, coming up in regular order, was read a third time.

            On the passage of the bill, the yeas and nays were taken (Roll No. 167), and there were--yeas 93, nays 1, absent and not voting 6, with the nays and absent and not voting being as follows:

            Nays: McGeehan.

            Absent and Not Voting: Boggs, Deem, Hartman, Lane, Moore and Rowe.

            So, a majority of the members elected to the House of Delegates having voted in the affirmative, the Speaker declared the bill (H. B. 2770) passed.

            Ordered, That the Clerk of the House communicate to the Senate the action of the House of Delegates and request concurrence therein.

            Com. Sub. for H. B. 2562, Relating to sales tax increment financing; still being in possession of the Clerk, the bill was taken up for further consideration.

            Delegate Cowles moved that the bill take effect from its passage.

            On this question, the yeas and nays were taken (Roll No. 169), and there were--yeas 79, nays 12, absent and not voting 9, with the nays and absent and not voting being as follows:

            Nays: Eldridge, Faircloth, Folk, Guthrie, Ihle, Marcum, Moffatt, Pushkin, Reynolds, Rodighiero, P. Smith and Sponaugle.

            Absent and Not Voting: Boggs, Deem, Hartman, Lane, Moore, Pasdon, Perdue, Rowe and Weld.

            So, two thirds of the members elected to the House of Delegates having voted in the affirmative, the Speaker declared the bill (Com. Sub. for H. B. 2562) takes effect from its passage.

            Ordered, That the Clerk of the House communicate to the Senate the action of the House of Delegates and request concurrence therein.

Second ReadingCom. Sub. for H. B. 2457, Prohibiting the use of the name or likeness of elected or appointed officials on publicly-owned vehicles; on second reading, coming up in regular order, was read a second time and ordered to engrossment and third reading.

            Com. Sub. for H. B. 2493, Relating to requirements for insurance policies and contracts providing accident and sickness insurance or direct health care services that cover anti-cancer medications; on second reading, coming up in regular order, was read a second time.

            At the request of Delegate Cowles, and by unanimous consent, the bill was advanced to third reading with amendments pending and the restricted right to amend jointly by Delegates Ellington and Eldridge, and the rule was suspended to permit the consideration of the amendments on that reading.

            H. B. 2615, West Virginia Small Business Capital Act; on second reading, coming up in regular order, was read a second time.

            An amendment, recommended by the Committee on Small Business, Entrepreneurship and Economic Development, was reported by the Clerk and adopted, amending the bill as follows:

            On page three, subdivision four, line eleven, after the word “entity” and the semicolon, by inserting the word “and”.

            On page three, subsection (c), line eight, after the word “than”, by striking out“$25,000” and inserting “$10,000”.

            On page four, subsection (h), line twenty-six, after the words “sale of”, by striking out the words “the twenty-fifth security” and inserting in lieu thereof the words “securities to the twenty-fifth person”.

            On page four, subsection (h), line twenty-nine, after the word “agent” and the period, by inserting the following:

            “When the Secretary of State receives a Notice of Issuer, he or she shall promptly forward a copy of it to the auditor of the State of West Virginia.”

            On page four, after subsection (h), following line two, by inserting two new sections to read as follows:

§32-5-505. Misleading filings, criminal penalties and civil liabilities.

            Notwithstanding the provisions of section five hundred two of this article, an issuer under this article shall be subject to the provisions of sections four hundred four, four hundred nine and four hundred ten of article four of this chapter.”

            And,

§32-5-506. Anti-fraud provisions preserved.

            Notwithstanding the provisions of this article, nothing in this exemption shall be construed to alleviate any person from the anti-fraud provisions of articles one, two, three or four of this chapter.”

            The bill was then ordered to engrossment and third reading.

            Com. Sub. for H. B. 2648, Allowing authorized entities to maintain a stock of epinephrine auto-injectors to be used for emergency; on second reading, coming up in regular order, was read a second time and ordered to engrossment and third reading.

            Com. Sub. for H. B. 2662, Eye Care Consumer Protection Law; on second reading, coming up in regular order, was read a second time and ordered to engrossment and third reading.

            H. B. 2733, Removing certain combinations of drugs containing hydrocodone from Schedule III of the controlled substances law; on second reading, coming up in regular order, was read a second time.

            An amendment, recommended by the Committee on Health and Human Resources, was reported by the Clerk and adopted, amending the bill on page twenty-three, line one hundred eighty-three, by restoring the stricken word “or” and removing the underscored words “or V”.

            The bill was then ordered to engrossment and third reading.

            H. B. 2879, Relating to certain limitations on amount of state funds on deposit in any depository; on second reading, coming up in regular order, was read a second time and ordered to engrossment and third reading.

First ReadingThe following bills on first reading, coming up in regular order, were each read a first time and ordered to second reading:

            Com. Sub. for S. B. 175, Authorizing DHHR promulgate legislative rules,

            S. B. 238, Limiting certain county board of education liability arising from unorganized recreation,

            Com. Sub. for H. B. 2240, Providing that an act of domestic violence or sexual offense by strangling is an aggravated felony offense,

            Com. Sub. for H. B. 2283, Authorizing the Department of Environmental Protection to promulgate legislative rules,

            H. B. 2627, Providing protection against property crimes committed against coal mines, utilities and other industrial facilities,

            H. B. 2628, Changing the date of filing announcements of candidacies,

            Com. Sub. for H. B. 2674, Making home schooled students eligible for a Promise scholarship without taking the GED test,

            Com. Sub. for H. B. 2718, Transferring funds remaining in the Racetrack Modernization Fund to the State Road Fund and closing the Racetrack Modernization Fund,

            Com. Sub. for H. B. 2755, Relating to service and professional employee positions at jointly established schools,

            Com. Sub. for H. B. 2773, Relating to the West Virginia Film Industry Investment tax credit,

            Com. Sub. for H. B. 2778, State Infrastructure Fund Program,

            And,

            H. B. 2820, Relating to affirmative defenses against mechanics’ liens.

            H. B. 2880, Creating an addiction treatment pilot program; on first reading, coming up in regular order, was, at the request of Delegate Cowles, and by unanimous consent, laid over one day, retaining its place on the calendar.

Miscellaneous Business

            Delegate Byrd noted to the Clerk that he was absent when the vote was taken on Roll. No. 164, and that had he been present, he would have voted “Yea” thereon.

            Delegates A. Evans, Hamilton and Romine announced that they were absent when the votes were taken on Roll Nos. 124 through 163, and that had they been present, they would have voted “Yea” thereon.

            At the request of Delegate Cowles, and by unanimous consent, the House of Delegates returned to further consideration of H. B. 2755.

            Delegate Cowles moved that the constitutional rule requiring the bill to be fully and distinctly read on three different days be dispensed with.

            On this question, H. B. 2775 was mistakenly displayed on the voting board and the roll was taken (Roll No. 170).

            Following consultation with the Clerk, the correct bill number was displayed and the Speaker again stated the motion before the House, and on this question, the yeas and nays were taken (Roll No. 171), and there were--yeas 70, nays 22, absent and not voting 8, with the nays and absent and not voting being as follows:

            Nays: Bates, Byrd, Eldridge, Faircloth, Fast, Fluharty, Folk, Gearheart, Hamilton, Hicks, Hornbuckle, Howell, Ihle, Kurcaba, Marcum, McGeehan, Moffatt, J. Nelson, Reynolds, Rodighiero, Storch and H. White.

            Absent and Not Voting: Boggs, Hartman, Lane, Moore, Perdue, Rowe, Westfall and Williams.

            So, four fifths of the members present not having voted in the affirmative, the constitutional rule was not dispensed with.

Leaves of Absence

            At the request of Delegate Cowles, and by unanimous consent, leaves of absence for the day were granted Delegates Boggs, Hartman and Moore.

            Delegate Caputo arose to a point of inquiry as to the status of H. B. 2775. 

            The Speaker stated that the Roll call to suspend the constitutional rule was taken in error, and that the correct bill had subsequently been acted on by the House, and that the status of H. B. 2775 was unchanged.

            Delegate Marcum asked and obtained unanimous consent that the remarks of Delegate Deem regarding recent newspaper articles about the Legislature be printed in the Appendix to the Journal.

            At 1:23 p.m., on motion of Delegate Cowles, the House of Delegates recessed until 6:00 p.m.

* * * * * * *

Evening Session

* * * * * * *

-Continued-

            At the request of Delegate Cowles and by unanimous consent, the House of Delegates returned to the Third Order of Business for the purpose of receiving committee reports.

            Delegate Howell, Chair of the Committee on Government Organization, submitted the following report, which was received:

            Your Committee on Government Organization has had under consideration:

            H. B. 2237, Prohibiting project labor agreements on state-funded construction contracts,

            And reports the same back, with amendment, with the recommendation that it do pass, as amended, but that it first be referred to the Committee on Finance.

            In accordance with the former direction of the Speaker, the bill (H. B. 2237) was referred to the Committee on Finance.

            Delegate Howell, Chair of the Committee on Government Organization, submitted the following report, which was received:

            Your Committee on Government Organization has had under consideration:

            S. B. 412, Relating to Real Estate Commission complaint filings, 

            And reports the same back with the recommendation that it do pass, but that it first be referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.

            In accordance with the former direction of the Speaker, the bill (S. B. 412) was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.

            Delegate Howell, Chair of the Committee on Government Organization, submitted the following report, which was received:

            Your Committee on Government Organization has had under consideration:

            H. B. 2839, Eliminating late fees charged by the Secretary of State,

            And reports the same back with the recommendation that it do pass.

            Delegate Howell, Chair of the Committee on Government Organization, submitted the following report, which was received:

            Your Committee on Government Organization has had under consideration:

             Com. Sub. for S. B. 60, Requiring food handler examinations and cards,

            And,

            H. B. 2835, Reorganizing the Hatfield-McCoy Regional Recreation Authority,

            And reports the same back, with amendment, with the recommendation that they each do pass, as amended.

            Delegate Nelson, Chair of the Committee on Finance, submitted the following report, which was received:

            Your Committee on Finance has had under consideration:

            H. B. 2569, Relating to the Dealer Recovery Program,

            H. B. 2657, Allowing members of the Livestock Care Standards Board to be reimbursed for expenses consistent with the West Virginia Department of Agriculture Travel Policy and Procedure,

            And,

            S. B. 398, Extending expiration date for health care provider tax on eligible acute care hospitals,

            And reports the same back with the recommendation that they each do pass.

            On motion for leave, a bill was introduced (Originating in the Committee on Finance and reported with the recommendation that it do pass), which was read by its title, as follows:

By Delegates E. Nelson, Anderson, Canterbury, Espinosa, Frich, Hamilton, Westfall, Moye and Williams:

            H. B. 2933 - “A Bill making a supplementary appropriation of public moneys out of the Treasury from the balance of moneys remaining as an unappropriated surplus balance in the State Fund, General Revenue, to the Department of Administration, Public Defender Services, fund 0226, fiscal year 2015, organization 0221, by supplementing and amending the appropriations for the fiscal year ending June 30, 2015.”

            Delegate Nelson, Chair of the Committee on Finance, submitted the following report, which was received:

            Your Committee on Finance has had under consideration:

            H. B. 2103, Relating generally to boards of examination and registration,

            And reports back a committee substitute therefore, with a new title, as follows:

            Com. Sub. for H. B. 2103 - “A Bill to amend and reenact §30-1-5, §30-3-10, §30-3E-4, §30-4-8, §30-5-9, §30-7-6, §30-7A-3, §30-8-8, §30-10-8, §30-14-4 and §30-21-7 of the Code of West Virginia, 1931, as amended, all generally relating to boards of examination for licensure; requiring information regarding complaints against licensees to be posted on a website; requiring certain boards regulating professions to require national criminal background checks on applicants for a new license; amending licesure requirements for applicants; providing rulemaking authority; and providing exceptions,”

            H. B. 2202, Relating to more equitable disbursement of funds to county boards,

            And reports back a committee substitute therefore, with a new title, as follows:

            Com. Sub. for H. B. 2202 - “A Bill to amend and reenact §18-20-5 of the Code of West Virginia, 1931, as amended, relating to the disbursement of funds to reimburse county boards for costs associated with educating high cost/high acuity special needs students; requiring the state superintendent to develop a new formula for the disbursement of the funds; removing the requirement for the superintendent to review policies and report annually to the legislature,”

            H. B. 2268, Removing the severance tax on timber,

            And reports back a committee substitute therefore, with a new title, as follows:

            Com. Sub. for H. B. 2268 - “A Bill to amend and reenact §11-13A-3b of the Code of West Virginia, 1931, as amended, relating to reducing and terminating the severance tax on timber,”

            H. B. 2462, Relating to certain deposits of tax proceeds,

            And reports back a committee substitute therefore, with a new title, as follows:

            Com. Sub. for H. B. 2462 - “A Bill to and reenact §11-15-30 of the Code of West Virginia, 1931, as amended, relating to the dedication and deposit of certain tax proceeds; reducing the amount of sales tax proceeds annually dedicated to the School Major Improvement Fund by $2,000,004 for the fiscal year 2016; reducing the amount of sales tax proceeds annually dedicated to the School Construction Fund by $6 million for the fiscal years 2016; and making stylistic changes,”

            H. B. 2571, Creating a fund for pothole repair contributed to by private businesses or entities,

            And reports back a committee substitute therefore, with a new title, as follows:

            Com. Sub. for H. B. 2571 - “A Bill to amend the Code of West Virginia, 1931, as amended, by adding thereto a new section, designated §17-2A-8d, relating generally to road repair; creating a special fund for contributions by private businesses or entities; allowing contributing entities to designate which repairs will be made with the contribution; providing for acknowledgment of contributions; authorizing rulemaking,”

            And,

            H. B. 2652, Reducing the assessment paid by hospitals to the Health Care Authority,

            And reports back a committee substitute therefore, with a new title, as follows:

            Com. Sub. for H. B. 2652 - “A Bill to amend and reenact §16-29B-3 and §16-29B-8 of the Code of West Virginia, 1931, as amended, relating to annual assessments on hospitals by the West Virginia Health Care Authority; adding definitions; changing the basis for the annual assessment,”

            With the recommendation that the committee substitutes each do pass.

Messages from the Senate

            A message from the Senate, by

            The Clerk of the Senate, announced concurrence in the House of Delegates amendment, with amendment, and the passage, as amended, to take effect from passage, of

            Com. Sub. for S. B. 6, Relating to medical professional liability.

            On motion of Delegate Cowles, the bill was taken up for immediate consideration.

            The following Senate amendment to the House of Delegates amendment was reported by the Clerk:

            On page seventeen, section ten, subsection (b), by striking out the word “arise” and inserting in lieu thereof the words “are filed”.

            On motion of Delegate Cowles, the House of Delegates concurred in the Senate amendment.

            The bill, as amended by the Senate, was then put upon its passage.

            On the passage of the bill, the yeas and nays were taken (Roll No. 172), and there were--yeas 77, nays 16, absent and not voting 7, with the nays and absent and not voting being as follows:

            Nays: Byrd, Caputo, Eldridge, Fast, Ferro, Fleischauer, Fluharty, Manchin, Marcum, Miley, Perdue, Perry, Rodighiero, Skinner, Walters and H. White.

            Absent and Not Voting: Boggs, Cooper, Guthrie, Longstreth, Moore, Morgan and L. Phillips.

             So, a majority of the members elected to the House of Delegates having voted in the affirmative, the Speaker declared the bill (Com. Sub. for S. B. 6) passed.

            Delegate Cowles moved that the bill take effect from its passage.

            On this question, the yeas and nays were taken (Roll No. 173), and there were--yeas 77, nays 16, absent and not voting 7, with the nays and absent and not voting being as follows:

            Nays: Byrd, Caputo, Eldridge, Fleischauer, Hicks, Hornbuckle, Manchin, Miley, Perdue, Pushkin, Reynolds, Rodighiero, Rowe, Skinner, Sponaugle and Walters.

            Absent and Not Voting: Boggs, Cooper, Guthrie, Longstreth, Moore, Morgan and L. Phillips.

            So, two thirds of the members elected to the House of Delegates having voted in the affirmative, the Speaker declared the bill (Com. Sub. for S. B. 6) takes effect from its passage.

            Ordered, That the Clerk of the House communicate to the Senate the action of the House of Delegates.

            A message from the Senate, by

            The Clerk of the Senate, announced concurrence in the amendment of the House of Delegates and the passage, as amended, of

            S. B. 299, Clarifying start date of State Police duty-related disability payments.

            A message from the Senate, by

            The Clerk of the Senate, announced the passage by the Senate and requested the concurrence of the House of Delegates in the passage, of  

            S. B. 415 - “A Bill to amend and reenact §11-14C-23 of the Code of West Virginia, 1931, as amended, relating to removal of certain tax discounts from motor fuel excise tax”; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary then Finance.

Conference Committee Reports

            Delegate Shott, from the Committee of Conference on matters of disagreement between the two houses, as to

            Com. Sub. for H. B. 2002, Predicating actions for damages upon principles of comparative fault.

            Submitted the following report, which was received:

            Your Committee of Conference on the disagreeing votes of the two houses as to the amendments of the Senate to Engrossed Committee Substitute for House Bill No. 2002 having met, after full and free conference, have agreed to recommend and do recommend to their respective houses, as follows:

            That the House of Delegates agree to the amendment of the Senate to the bill striking out everything after the enacting clause.

            And,

            That both houses agree to the following amendments to the Senate amendment as follows:

            On page three, section thirteen-c, line two, by striking out the words “equal to or”.

            On page six, section thirteen-d, line eight, after the word “act” by changing the period to a colon and inserting the following proviso: “Provided, That the plaintiff has been convicted of such felony, or if deceased, the jury makes a finding that the decedent committed such felony.”

            And,

            That both houses recede from their respective positions as to the title of the bill and agree to the same as follows:

            Com. Sub. for H. B. 2002 - “A Bill to repeal §55-7-13 and §55-7-24 of the Code of West Virginia, 1931, as amended; and to amend said code by adding thereto four new sections, designated §55-7-13a, §55-7-13b, §55-7-13c and §55-7-13d, all generally relating to predicating actions for damages upon principles of comparative fault; establishing the comparative fault standard; abolishing joint liability and implementing several liability; establishing how to consider the fault of parties and nonparties to a civil action; establishing how to consider the fault of, and the amounts paid by, settling parties; establishing how to reallocate any portion of a judgment a plaintiff is unable to collect; providing for the use of special interrogatories; establishing certain exceptions to several liability; clarifying fault may be imputed to another person who was acting as an agent or servant of another; establishing limits on liability where a plaintiff is involved in a felony criminal act; providing for the burden of proof and limitations; and defining terms.”

                                                                        Respectfully submitted,

            John H. Shott,                                                 Charles S. Trump,

            John McCuskey,                                             Mitch Carmichel,

            Dana Lynch,                                                   Corey Palumbo,

               Conferees on the part                                    Conferees on the part

                    House of Delegates.                                 of the Senate.

On motion of Delegate Shott, the report of the Committee of Conference was adopted.

            The bill, as amended by said report, was then put upon its passage.

            On the passage of the bill, the yeas and nays were taken (Roll No. 174), and there were--yeas 71, nays 21, absent and not voting 8, with the nays and absent and not voting being as follows:

            Nays: Bates, Byrd, Caputo, Eldridge, Fast, Fleischauer, Fluharty, Hicks, Hornbuckle, Manchin, Miley, Perdue, Perry, Pushkin, Reynolds, Rodighiero, Rowe, Skinner, Sponaugle, Storch and Weld.

            Absent and Not Voting: Boggs, Campbell, Cooper, Guthrie, Longstreth, Moore, Morgan and L. Phillips.

             So, a majority of the members present and voting having voted in the affirmative, the Speaker declared the bill (Com. Sub. for H. B. 2002) passed.

            Ordered, That the Clerk of the House communicate to the Senate the action of the House of Delegates.

            Delegate Lane, from the Committee of Conference on matters of disagreement between the two houses, as to

            Com. Sub. for H. B. 2025, Prohibiting certain sex offenders from loitering within one thousand feet of a school or child care facility,

            Submitted the following report, which was received:

            Your Committee of Conference on the disagreeing votes of the two houses as to the amendment of the Senate to Engrossed Committee Substitute for House Bill No. 2025 having met, after full and free conference, have agreed to recommend and do recommend to their respective houses as follows:

            That both houses recede from their respective positions as to the amendment of the Senate striking out everything following the enacting and inserting new language, and agree to the same as follows:

            “That the Code of West Virginia, 1931, as amended, be amended by adding thereto a new section, designated §61-8-29; and that §62-12-26 of said code be amended and reenacted, all to read as follows:

CHAPTER 61. CRIMES AND THEIR PUNISHMENT.

ARTICLE 8. CRIMES AGAINST CHASTITY, MORALITY AND DECENCY.

§61-8-29. Criminal loitering by persons on supervised release.

            (a) Any person serving a period of supervised release of ten years or more pursuant to the provision of section twenty-six, article twelve, chapter sixty-two of this code who loiters within one thousand feet of the property line of the residence or workplace of a victim of a sexually violent offense for which the person was convicted shall be guilty of a misdemeanor and, upon conviction thereof, shall be confined in jail for not more than thirty days.

            (b) Any person serving a period of supervised release of ten years or more pursuant to the provisions of section twenty-six, article twelve, chapter sixty-two of this code for an offense where the victim was a minor who loiters within one thousand feet of the property line of a facility or business the principal purpose of which is the education, entertainment or care of minor children, playground, athletic facility or school bus stop shall be guilty of a misdemeanor and, upon conviction thereof, shall be confined in jail for a period of not more than thirty days.

            (c) A person does not violate the provisions of subsection (a) or (b) of this section unless he or she has previously been asked to leave the proscribed location by an authorized person and thereafter refuses to leave or leaves and thereafter returns to the proscribed location.

            (d) As used in this section:

            (1) ‘Authorized person’ means:

            (A) A law-enforcement officer acting in his or her official capacity;

            (B) A security officer employed by a business or facility to protect persons or property acting in his or her employment capacity;

            (C) An owner, manager or employee of a facility or business having a principal purpose the caring for, education or entertainment of minors;

            (D) A victim or parent, guardian or lawful temporary or permanent custodian thereof;

            (E) An employee of a county Board of Education acting in his or her employment capacity.

            (2) ‘Facility or business, the principal purpose of which is the education, entertainment or care of minor children’ means:

            (A) A pre-school, primary, intermediate, middle or high school, either public or private;

            (B) A childcare facility;

            (C) A park;

            (D) An athletic facility used by minors;

            (E) A school bus stop.

            (3) ‘Loitering’ means to enter or remain on property while having no legitimate purpose or, if a legitimate purpose exists, remaining on that property beyond the time necessary to fulfill that purpose.

            (e) Nothing in this section shall be construed to prohibit or limit a person’s presence within one thousand feet of a location or facility referenced in this section if the person is there present for the purposes of supervision, counseling or other activity in which the person is directed to participate as a condition of supervision or where the person has the express permission of his supervising officer to be present.

CHAPTER 62. CRIMINAL PROCEDURE.

ARTICLE 12. PROBATION AND PAROLE.

§62-12-26. Extended supervision for certain sex offenders; sentencing; conditions;                             supervision provisions; supervision fee.

            (a) Notwithstanding any other provision of this code to the contrary, any defendant convicted after the effective date of this section of a violation of section twelve, article eight, chapter sixty-one of this code or a felony violation of the provisions of article eight-b, eight-c or eight-d of said chapter shall, as part of the sentence imposed at final disposition, be required to serve, in addition to any other penalty or condition imposed by the court, a period of supervised release of up to fifty years: Provided, That the period of supervised release imposed by the court pursuant to this section for a defendant convicted after the effective date of this section as amended and reenacted during the first extraordinary session of the Legislature, 2006, of a violation of section three or seven, article eight-b, chapter sixty-one of this code and sentenced pursuant to section nine-a of said article, shall be no less than ten years: Provided, however, That a defendant designated after the effective date of this section as amended and reenacted during the first extraordinary session of the Legislature, 2006, as a sexually violent predator pursuant to the provisions of section two-a, article twelve, chapter fifteen of this code shall be subject, in addition to any other penalty or condition imposed by the court, to supervised release for life: Provided further, That pursuant to the provisions of subsection (g) of this section, a court may modify, terminate or revoke any term of supervised release imposed pursuant to subsection (a) of this section.

            (b) Any person required to be on supervised release for a between the minimum term of ten years and life pursuant to the provisos of subsection (a) of this section also shall be further prohibited from:

            (1) Establishing a residence or accepting employment within one thousand feet of a school or child care facility or within one thousand feet of the residence of a victim or victims of any sexually violent offenses for which the person was convicted;

            (2) Loitering within one thousand feet of a school or child care facility or within one thousand feet of the residence of a victim or victims of any sexually violent offenses for which the person was convicted: Provided, That the imposition of this prohibition shall apply to a defendant convicted after the effective date of this section as amended and reenacted during the regular session of the Legislature, 2015: Provided, however, That as used herein ‘loitering’ means to enter or remain on property while having no legitimate purpose or, if a legitimate purpose exists, remaining on that property beyond the time necessary to fulfill that purpose: Provided further, That nothing in this subdivision shall be construed to prohibit or limit a person’s presence within one thousand feet of a location or facility referenced in this subdivision if the person is present for the purposes of supervision, counseling or other activity in which the person is directed to participate as a condition of supervision or where the person has the express permission of his supervising officer to be present;

            (2) (3) Establishing a residence or any other living accommodation in a household in which a child under sixteen resides if the person has been convicted of a sexually violent offense against a child, unless the person is one of the following:

            (i) The child’s parent;

            (ii) The child’s grandparent; or

            (iii) The child’s stepparent and the person was the stepparent of the child prior to being convicted of a sexually violent offense, the person’s parental rights to any children in the home have not been terminated, the child is not a victim of a sexually violent offense perpetrated by the person, and the court determines that the person is not likely to cause harm to the child or children with whom such person will reside: Provided, That nothing in this subsection shall preclude a court from imposing residency or employment restrictions as a condition of supervised release on defendants other than those subject to the provision of this subsection.

            (c) The period of supervised release imposed by the provisions of this section shall begin upon the expiration of any period of probation, the expiration of any sentence of incarceration or the expiration of any period of parole supervision imposed or required of the person so convicted, whichever expires later.

            (d) Any person sentenced to a period of supervised release pursuant to the provisions of this section shall be supervised by a multijudicial circuit probation officer, if available. Until such time as a multijudicial circuit probation officer is available, the offender shall be supervised by the probation office of the sentencing court or of the circuit in which he or she resides.

            (e) A defendant sentenced to a period of supervised release shall be subject to any or all of the conditions applicable to a person placed upon probation pursuant to the provisions of section nine of this article: Provided, That any defendant sentenced to a period of supervised release pursuant to this section shall be required to participate in appropriate offender treatment programs or counseling during the period of supervised release unless the court deems the offender treatment programs or counseling to no longer be appropriate or necessary and makes express findings in support thereof.

            Within ninety days of the effective date of this section as amended and reenacted during the first extraordinary session of the Legislature, 2006, the Secretary of the Department of Health and Human Resources shall propose rules and emergency rules for legislative approval in accordance with the provisions of article three, chapter twenty-nine-a of this code establishing qualifications for sex offender treatment programs and counselors based on accepted treatment protocols among licensed mental health professionals.

            (f) The sentencing court may, based upon defendant's ability to pay, impose a supervision fee to offset the cost of supervision. Said fee shall not exceed $50 per month. Said fee may be modified periodically based upon the defendant's ability to pay.

            (g) Modification of conditions or revocation. -- The court may:

            (1) Terminate a term of supervised release and discharge the defendant released at any time after the expiration of two years of supervised release, pursuant to the provisions of the West Virginia Rules of Criminal Procedure relating to the modification of probation, if it is satisfied that such action is warranted by the conduct of the defendant released and the interests of justice;

            (2) Extend a period of supervised release if less than the maximum authorized period was previously imposed or modify, reduce or enlarge the conditions of supervised release, at any time prior to the expiration or termination of the term of supervised release, consistent with the provisions of the West Virginia Rules of Criminal Procedure relating to the modification of probation and the provisions applicable to the initial setting of the terms and conditions of post-release supervision;

            (3) Revoke a term of supervised release and require the defendant to serve in prison all or part of the term of supervised release without credit for time previously served on supervised release if the court, pursuant to the West Virginia Rules of Criminal Procedure applicable to revocation of probation, finds by clear and convincing evidence that the defendant violated a condition of supervised release, except that a defendant whose term is revoked under this subdivision may not be required to serve more than the period of supervised release;

            (4) Order the defendant to remain at his or her place of residence during nonworking hours and, if the court so directs, to have compliance monitored by telephone or electronic signaling devices, except that an order under this paragraph may be imposed only as an alternative to incarceration.

            (h) Written statement of conditions. -- The court shall direct that the probation officer provide the defendant with a written statement at the defendant's sentencing hearing that sets forth all the conditions to which the term of supervised release is subject and that it is sufficiently clear and specific to serve as a guide for the defendant's conduct and for such supervision as is required.

            (i) Supervised release following revocation. -- When a term of supervised release is revoked and the defendant is required to serve a term of imprisonment that is less than the maximum term of supervised release authorized under subsection (a) of this section, the court may include a requirement that the defendant be placed on a term of supervised release after imprisonment. The length of such term of supervised release shall not exceed the term of supervised release authorized by this section less any term of imprisonment that was imposed upon revocation of supervised release.

            (j) Delayed revocation. -- The power of the court to revoke a term of supervised release for violation of a condition of supervised release and to order the defendant to serve a term of imprisonment and, subject to the limitations in subsection (i) of this section, a further term of supervised release extends beyond the expiration of the term of supervised release for any period necessary for the adjudication of matters arising before its expiration if, before its expiration, a

warrant or summons has been issued on the basis of an allegation of such a violation.”

            And,

            That both houses recede from their respective positions as to the title of the bill and agree to a new title as follows:

            Com. Sub. for H. B. 2025 - “A Bill to amend the Code of West Virginia, 1931, as amended, by adding thereto a new section, designated §61-8-29; and to amend and reenact §62-12-26 of said code, relating to creating the offense of criminal loitering by persons on supervised release; prohibiting loitering by such persons within one thousand feet of a victim’s home, schools and facilities providing care and entertainment for children; defining terms; establishing penalties; and prohibiting certain sex offenders on supervised release from loitering within one thousand feet of a school, child care facility, or victim.”

                                                                                    Respectfully Submitted,

             Patrick Lane,                                                   David Nohe,

            Dana Lynch,                                                    Ed Gaunch,

            Ryan Weld,                                                     Bob Williams,

                Conferees on the part                                             Conferees on the part

                    of the House of Delegates.                   of the Senate.

            At the request of Delegate Cowles, and by unanimous consent, the House of Delegates returned to further consideration of Com. Sub. for H. B. 2755.

            Delegate Cowles moved that the constitutional rule requiring the bill to be fully and distinctly read on three different days be dispensed with.

            On this question, the yeas and nays were taken (Roll No. 175), and there were--yeas 92, nays none, absent and not voting 8, with the absent and not voting being as follows:

            Absent and Not Voting: Boggs, Campbell, Cooper, Guthrie, Longstreth, Moore, Morgan and L. Phillips.

            So, four fifths of the members present having voted in the affirmative, the constitutional rule was dispensed with.

            The bill was then read a second time and ordered to engrossment and third reading.

            Having been engrossed, the bill was read a third time and put upon its passage.

            The question being on the passage of the bill, the yeas and nays were taken (Roll No. 176), and there were--yeas 92, nays none, absent and not voting 8, with the absent and not voting being as follows:

            Absent and Not Voting: Boggs, Campbell, Cooper, Guthrie, Longstreth, Moore, Morgan and L. Phillips.

            So, a majority of the members present and voting having voted in the affirmative, the Speaker declared the bill (Com. Sub. for H. B. 2755) passed.

            Delegate Cowles moved that the bill take effect from its passage.

            On this question, the yeas and nays were taken (Roll No. 177), and there were--yeas 92, nays none, absent and not voting 8, with the absent and not voting being as follows:

            Absent and Not Voting: Boggs, Campbell, Cooper, Guthrie, Longstreth, Moore, Morgan and L. Phillips.

            So, two thirds of the members elected to the House of Delegates having voted in the affirmative, the Speaker declared the bill (Com. Sub. for H. B. 2755) takes effect from its passage.

            Ordered, That the Clerk of the House communicate to the Senate the action of the House of Delegates and request concurrence therein.

            Com. Sub. for H. B. 2025, Prohibiting certain sex offenders from loitering within one thousand feet of a school or child care facility; still being in possession of the Clerk, was taken up for further consideration.

            On motion of Delegate Lane, the report of the Committee of Conference was adopted.

            The bill, as amended by said report, was then put upon its passage.

            On the passage of the bill, the yeas and nays were taken (Roll No. 178), and there were--yeas 92, nays none, absent and not voting 8, with the absent and not voting being as follows:

            Absent and Not Voting: Boggs, Cooper, Guthrie, Longstreth, Moore, Morgan, L. Phillips and Stansbury.

             So, a majority of the members present and voting having voted in the affirmative, the Speaker declared the bill (Com. Sub. for H. B. 2025) passed.

            Ordered, That the Clerk of the House communicate to the Senate the action of the House of Delegates.

Miscellaneous Business

            Delegate Marcum filed a form with the Clerk’s Office per House Rule 94b to be added as a cosponsor of H. B. 2835.

            Delegate Upson filed a form with the Clerk’s Office per House Rule 94b to be added as a cosponsor of H. B. 2878.

            At 7:05 p.m., the House of Delegates adjourned until 11:00 a.m., Tuesday, February 24, 2015.