Senate Bill No. 655

(By Senators Prezioso, Caruth, Foster, Unger and Plymale)

____________

[Introduced February 19, 2007; referred to the Committee on Health and Human Resources; and then to the Committee on Finance.]

____________




A BILL to amend the Code of West Virginia, 1931, as amended, by adding thereto a new article, designated §49-10-1, §49-10-2, §49-10-3, §49-10-4 and §49-10-5, all relating to creating performance-based outcomes to measure sufficiency of service delivery of child abuse and neglect cases by the Department of Health and Human Resources; providing intent and findings; setting forth performance measures; providing reporting requirements; providing rule-making authority; setting out alternative approaches; and establishing timelines.

Be it enacted by the Legislature of West Virginia:
That the Code of West Virginia, 1931, as amended, be amended by adding thereto a new article, designated §49-10-1, §49-10-2, §49-10-3, §49-10-4 and §49-10-5
, all to read as follows:
ARTICLE 49.
MANAGEMENT OF CHILD ABUSE AND NEGLECT CASES .
§49-10-1. Legislative intent and findings.

(a) The Legislature is committed to providing for the well-being of children and families of the State of West Virginia. Securing a future for some of our most vulnerable citizens, those involved in abuse and neglect proceedings, has proven to be a daunting and on-going effort for the Legislature. To continue to safeguard these children and families, the Legislature recognizes that the Bureau for Children and Families needs a more coordinated, performance based and goal-driven approach to delivery of services.
The most recent federal review of West Virginia's child welfare program yielded unsatisfactory results, with the state failing to be in substantial conformity with any measurement used in the review. The review, however, provides a tool with which to measure a state's service delivery. These federal outcomes reflect performance objectives for child welfare practices. The outcomes are geared toward a reduction in the occurrence of child abuse and neglect, an increase in permanency for children in foster care placements, an emphasis on reunification and alternatives to placement in group homes or institution settings.
Providing benchmarks to create measurable outcomes is essential to ensuring that all children receive more rapid permanency placements, placements that present a safe environment and an emphasis on the totality of a child's needs.
(b) The Legislature finds that adopting an approach to measure the state methods of management of cases of child abuse and neglect that is grounded in the measures established by the federal government would best provide a framework in which to gauge program strengths and weaknesses and would provide the Legislature with sufficient empirical data to make informed decisions about the sufficiency of the delivery of child and abuse services.
§49-10-2. Definitions.
For purposes of this article the following terms have the meaning assigned them in this section:
(1) "Case management" means the administration and care of a child's case within the child welfare system by an individual or team that includes coordination of all necessary elements to increase permanency for children in foster care placements, provide an emphasis on reunification and alternatives to placement in group homes or institution settings.
(2) "Child and family service review"
means the evaluation program within the federal government's Department of Human Services' Administration for Children and Families for assuring state compliance with titles IV-B and IV-E of the Social Security Act.
(3) "Child welfare program" means the program within the state Department of Health and Human Resources that has responsibility for management of child abuse and neglect matters.
(4) "Commission" means the Legislative Oversight Commission for Health and Human Resources Accountability established in article twenty-nine-e of chapter sixteen of this code.
(5) "Department" means the West Virginia Department of Health and Human Resources.
(6) "Performance review" means an accountability system which establishes benchmarks to evaluate and determine the effective and efficient performance of the child welfare program.
(7) "Performance measures" means effects or results of effective operation of a child welfare program.
(8) "Secretary" means the Secretary of the Department of Health and Human Resources.
(9) "Substantial compliance" means a finding by the federal Child and Family Service Review Team that measures the performance of state child welfare programs that the state's child welfare program performance is satisfactorily acceptable in reaching their federally required performance measures.
§49-10-3. Reporting requirements.
(a) Performance review and performance measurement are valuable tools for identifying serious program progress and areas of concern within the delivery of services provided by the child welfare system. As a result, the Secretary of the Department of Health and Human Resources shall conduct a biennial performance review of the child welfare services for which it has oversight using Child and Family Services Review as a guide and measuring the outcomes and progress of the state child welfare program against federal outcome standards: Provided, That the secretary may conduct a performance review at any time he or she determines a performance review to be necessary.
(b) The results of the performance review set forth in subsection (a) of this section shall be reported to the Joint Committee on Government and Finance and the Legislative Oversight Commission on Health and Human Resources Accountability biennially. The Legislative Oversight Commission on Health and Human Resources Accountability shall access the results of performance review and performance measurement. These results shall be used by the commission as a guide in making recommendations for further legislative action to improve the performance of the child welfare program.
§49-10-4. Required performance outcomes; rule making.
In conducting the performance review the secretary shall measure outcomes using the federal index of outcomes, systemic factors and associated items used by the Child and Family Services Review Team to measure program performance. The secretary shall propose rules for legislative approval in accordance with the provisions of article three, chapter twenty-nine-a of this code to set forth the performance review measures required in this article and the manner in which the system shall be improved so as to meet the required federal outcomes. These rules shall include:
(1) Utilization of the federal index of outcomes, systemic factors and associated items developed and used as a measure by the Child and Family Service Review Team as a means of measuring program performance;
(2) A strategy to move a child in the care of the state to permanency and pursuing strategies and programs that place a priority on reuniting families and children;
(3) Creation of a process and strategy for assessing youth placed out of state, identifying needed community services for their return to the state, and initiating discharge plans for the actual return as soon as appropriate;
(4) A plan for joint action with the Department of Education to ensure that all children in out of home care receive education services;
(5) A means of privatization, as required by section five of this article, of elements and components of the child welfare program that are not in substantial compliance with the federal performance measures;
(6) The manner in which the department shall oversee program elements of privatization, including quality control of the privatized elements; and
(7) Anything additional considered necessary by the secretary to meet the requirements of this section.
§49-10-5. Alternative approaches; timelines.
(a) When either the Department of Health and Human Resources or the commission identify a problem and determine, through a performance review or regular monitoring of performance measures, that the federal outcomes continue not to be met and the child to be welfare program remains seriously impaired, the department shall pursue alternative approaches to service delivery. These alternatives shall include:
(1) Appointing a team of private sector improvement consultants to conduct on-site reviews and make strategic recommendations to the commission and the department toward remedy of the serious impairments;
(2) Directing that case management efforts, including adoption and foster care services, of the child welfare program within the department be privatized either on a county-by-county basis, regionally or statewide, depending upon direction from the commission and based upon the extent of the need to immediately address the impairment as identified by the performance review: Provided, That any contract to privatize portions of the child welfare program shall adhere to all requirements of the purchasing division as set forth in article three, chapter five-a of this code; and
(3) Recommend continued monitoring of the child welfare system and to set standards for staffing, reporting, training, time frames and case processing standards.
(b) Neither the Legislature or the department may take any action set forth in subsection (a) of this section until receipt of the results of a federal performance review conducted by the Child and Family Services team in two thousand eight.

NOTE: The purpose of this bill is to establish performance measures for the state child welfare program. The bill sets forth reporting requirements to the Legislature, establishes timelines, requires privatization of program components that do not meet the performance measures and grant rule-making authority to the Secretary of the Department of Health and Human Resources to accomplish the goals of the article.

This article is new; therefore, strike-throughs and underscoring have been omitted.