SENATE
HOUSE
JOINT
BILL STATUS
STATE LAW
REPORTS
EDUCATIONAL
CONTACT
home
home
Introduced Version Senate Resolution 7 History

   |  Email
Key: Green = existing Code. Red = new code to be enacted

SENATE RESOLUTION NO. 7

(By Senators Snyder, Unger, Miller, Browning, Wills, Edgell, Foster, Laird, Fanning and D. Facemire)

 

 

 

Opposing the United States Supreme Court’s interpretation of the Constitution in Citizens United regarding the constitutional rights of corporations; supporting an amendment to the Constitution to provide that corporations are not entitled to the entirety of protections or rights of natural persons, specifically so that the expenditure of corporate money to influence the electoral process is no longer a form of constitutionally protected speech; and calling on Congress to begin the process of amending the Constitution.

    Whereas, In 2010 the United States Supreme Court issued its decision in Citizens United v. Federal Election Committee, holding that independent spending on elections by corporations and other groups could not be limited by government regulations; and

    Whereas, This decision rolled back the legal restrictions on corporate spending in the electoral process, allowing for the unlimited corporate spending to influence elections, candidate selection, and policy decisions; and

    Whereas, In reaching this decision, a majority of the Supreme Court, relying on prior decisions, interpreted the First Amendment of the Constitution to afford corporations the same free speech protections as natural persons; and

    Whereas, In his eloquent dissent, Justice John Paul Stevens rightly recognized that “corporations have no consciences, no beliefs, no feelings, no thoughts, no desires. Corporations help structure and facilitate the activities of human beings, to be sure, and their ‘personhood’ often serves as a useful legal fiction. But they are not themselves members of ‘We the People’ by whom and for whom our Constitution was established”; and

    Whereas, The Court’s decision in Citizens United severely hampers the ability of federal, state and local governments to enact reasonable campaign finance reforms and regulations regarding corporate political activity; and

    Whereas, Corporations should not be afforded the entirety of protections or “rights” of natural persons, such that the expenditure of corporate money to influence the electoral process is a form of constitutionally protected speech; and

    Whereas, Several proposed amendments to the Constitution have been introduced in Congress that would allow government to regulate the raising and spending of money by corporations to influence elections; therefore, be it

    Resolved by the Senate:

    That the Senate opposes the United States Supreme Court’s interpretation of the Constitution in Citizens United regarding the constitutional rights of corporations; supports an amendment to the Constitution to provide that corporations are not entitled to the entirety of protections or rights of natural persons, specifically so that the expenditure of corporate money to influence the electoral process is no longer a form of constitutionally protected speech; and calls on Congress to begin the process of amending the Constitution; and, be it

    Further Resolved, That the Clerk is hereby directed to forward a copy of this resolution to the Clerk of the Supreme Court of the United States and to the members of Congress from West Virginia.

This Web site is maintained by the West Virginia Legislature's Office of Reference & Information.  |  Terms of Use  |   Email WebmasterWebmaster   |   © 2024 West Virginia Legislature **


X

Print On Demand

Name:
Email:
Phone:

Print